The ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis September 25-28, 1990 Autrans, France

Morphology and Rhyming: Two Powerful Alternatives to Letter-to-Sound Rules for Speech Synthesis

Cecil H. Coker, Kenneth W. Church, Maik Y. Liberman

AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, USA

Most speech synthesizers have tended to depend on letter-to-sound rules for most words, and resort to a small "exceptions dictionary" of about 5000 words to cover the more serious gaps in the letter-to-sound rules. The Bell Laboratories Text-to-Speech system, TTS, takes a radical dictionary-based approach; dictionary methods (with morphological and analogical extensions) are used for the vast majority of words. Only a fraction of a percent (0.5% of words overall; 0.1% of lowercase words) are left for letter-to-sound rules. Moving to an extreme dictionary-based approach cuts the error rate by at least an order of magnitude. Now that the dictionary is the rule and not the exception, the term "exceptions dictionary" seems somewhat dated.

Full Paper

Bibliographic reference.  Coker, Cecil H. / Church, Kenneth W. / Liberman, Maik Y. (1990): "Morphology and rhyming: two powerful alternatives to letter-to-sound rules for speech synthesis", In SSW1-1990, 83-86.