Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding

Joseph P. McKenna, Samridhi Choudhary, Michael Saxon, Grant P. Strimel, Athanasios Mouchtaris


End-to-end spoken language understanding (SLU) models are a class of model architectures that predict semantics directly from speech. Because of their input and output types, we refer to them as speech-to-interpretation (STI) models. Previous works have successfully applied STI models to targeted use cases, such as recognizing home automation commands, however no study has yet addressed how these models generalize to broader use cases. In this work, we analyze the relationship between the performance of STI models and the difficulty of the use case to which they are applied. We introduce empirical measures of dataset semantic complexity to quantify the difficulty of the SLU tasks. We show that near-perfect performance metrics for STI models reported in the literature were obtained with datasets that have low semantic complexity values. We perform experiments where we vary the semantic complexity of a large, proprietary dataset and show that STI model performance correlates with our semantic complexity measures, such that performance increases as complexity values decrease. Our results show that it is important to contextualize an STI model’s performance with the complexity values of its training dataset to reveal the scope of its applicability.


 DOI: 10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2929

Cite as: McKenna, J.P., Choudhary, S., Saxon, M., Strimel, G.P., Mouchtaris, A. (2020) Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding. Proc. Interspeech 2020, 4273-4277, DOI: 10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2929.


@inproceedings{McKenna2020,
  author={Joseph P. McKenna and Samridhi Choudhary and Michael Saxon and Grant P. Strimel and Athanasios Mouchtaris},
  title={{Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding}},
  year=2020,
  booktitle={Proc. Interspeech 2020},
  pages={4273--4277},
  doi={10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2929},
  url={http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2929}
}