ISCA Archive Interspeech 2009
ISCA Archive Interspeech 2009

Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus

Szu-wei Chen, Bei Wang, Yi Xu

We investigated how focus was prosodically realized in Taiwanese, Taiwan Mandarin and Beijing Mandarin by monolingual and bilingual speakers. Acoustic analyses showed that all speakers raised pitch and intensity of focused words, but only Beijing Mandarin speakers lowered pitch and intensity of post-focus words. Crossgroup differences in duration were mixed. When listening to stimuli from their own language groups, subjects from Beijing had over 80% focus recognition rate, while those from Taiwan had less than 70% recognition rate. This difference is mainly due to presence/absence of post-focus compression. These findings have implications for prosodic typology, language contact and bilingualism.

doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2009-298

Cite as: Chen, S.-w., Wang, B., Xu, Y. (2009) Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus. Proc. Interspeech 2009, 1007-1010, doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2009-298

  author={Szu-wei Chen and Bei Wang and Yi Xu},
  title={{Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus}},
  booktitle={Proc. Interspeech 2009},