The term “uptalk” describes utterance-final pitch rises that carry no sentence-structural information. Uptalk is usually dialectal or sociolectal, and Australian English (AusEng) is particularly known for this attribute. We ask here whether experience with an uptalk variety affects listeners’ ability to categorise rising pitch contours on the basis of the timing and height of their onset and offset. Listeners were two groups of English-speakers (AusEng, and American English), and three groups of listeners with L2 English: one group with Mandarin as L1 and experience of listening to AusEng, one with German as L1 and experience of listening to AusEng, and one with German as L1 but no AusEng experience. They heard nouns (e.g. flower, piano) in the framework “Got a NOUN”, each ending with a pitch rise artificially manipulated on three contrasts: low vs. high rise onset, low vs. high rise offset and early vs. late rise onset. Their task was to categorise the tokens as “question” or “statement”, and we analysed the effect of the pitch contrasts on their judgements. Only the native AusEng listeners were able to use the pitch contrasts systematically in making these categorisations.
Cite as: Asano, Y., Yuan, C., Grohe, A.-K., Weber, A., Antoniou, M., Cutler, A. (2020) Uptalk interpretation as a function of listening experience. Proc. Speech Prosody 2020, 735-739, doi: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-150
@inproceedings{asano20b_speechprosody,
author={Y. Asano and C. Yuan and A.-K. Grohe and A. Weber and M. Antoniou and A. Cutler},
title={{Uptalk interpretation as a function of listening experience}},
year=2020,
booktitle={Proc. Speech Prosody 2020},
pages={735--739},
doi={10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-150}
}